
Experience
Recently, I was in Washington, DC and NYC recording new episodes for my (not-yet-award-winning – but who’s counting?) podcast. One of my guests, a Chief Marketing Officer, revealed how she’s shifting her brand’s one-size-fits-all messaging to test three new customer journeys. They’re organized around three core affinities: faith, mothers, and singles. She’s chosen those because they seem a good starting place to see how she can boost RoAS.
My CMO is determined not to let perfect be the enemy of good. Sure she could wait for years to persuade her board to give her the funds to do ‘Netflix-style’ personalization.
But she’d rather do her job and start what I like to call ‘scrappy personalization’ now.
Why does this matter?
From my conversations with countless mid-market brands (anywhere between $5M and $20M in annual ad budgets), everyone’s desperate to squeeze more from their existing email lists, paid search, social, or programmatic. Yet, despite the big push, returns on all those direct response channels keep falling flat.
Sure, there are plenty of reasons why these efforts are underperforming:
Over-reliance on automation – Everyone wants an ‘easy’ button to give them 3x RoAS (good luck!).
Lack of bold testing – It’s hard, it takes time, and the art of running real tests is on the brink of extinction.
Obsessive focus on audiences alone – Many assume that if they just keep showing the same generic message 100 times to “the right people,” something will miraculously click.
But here’s one reason that doesn’t always top the list: Scrappy Personalization.
Reflection
I’m not a fan of the word ‘personalization’ because:
It sounds almost too polished.
It can feel overwhelming, like only Netflix, Google, or Amazon can pull it off.
Yes, Netflix invests billions in technology each year – somewhere in the range of $280-$560 million on their recommendation algorithms alone. That’s daunting.
But does personalization have to be that expensive?
I think back to my own fitness routine: once I redefined ‘exercise’ as simply ‘showing up’, I started going to the gym every single day. It wasn’t fancy. It was just me showing up. That’s the kind of bare-bone simplicity we can bring to personalization, too.
I call it ‘scrappy personalization’ because it fits my way of doing things. I never want to wait for everything to be perfect. I always want to get started. Because the sooner you do, the sooner you start learning things.
So be like the CMO on my podcast. Do something simple –and scrappy - now.
The cheapest, fastest, easiest way to lean into a more personalized approach – and boost returns across your direct response channels – is what that CMO shared:
Find three core affinities that draw people to your product or service.
Tailor your messaging and landing pages (customer journeys!) just a little bit for each affinity.
For instance, an insurance company might appeal to ‘convenience seekers’ who love its online policy center, while others might be drawn to the brand’s ‘trusted reputation’, and still others might respond best to ‘price-first’ messaging.
At a hunger-focused charity, ‘veteran hunger’ could resonate with veterans and their families, ‘Latin American hunger’ could hit home for Hispanic supporters, while ‘child hunger’ might strike a chord with parents and grandparents.
You don’t know what will work before you do it. Your target affinity groups don’t have to be perfect. Nor do your journeys. They can be based on your ‘best guess’ or ‘gut feel’ or whatever works for you.
You just have to get started.
Action
So how do you actually start? Here’s a ruthless-but-loving four-step plan:
Get out of your Comfort Zone – Big brands can be bureaucratic nightmares. Pretend you’re operating at a scrappy startup: craft three simple audience segments, identify why each cares about your offering, and map out how you’d message them differently.
Learn a new skill – Think like a ‘disruptive intrapreneur’. Yes, we need to balance maturity with a dose of ‘just go for it’. But if you never ‘break stuff’, you’ll never uncover the messaging that truly resonates with each of your three personalized segments, or find out if your assumptions were correct.
Create more value in your role – One-to-one personalization is the holy grail, but who has $300–$600 million for the perfect recommendation engine? A lean, test-and-learn approach – even if it’s just targeting three distinct segments – can drive higher % conversion rates than BAU, and thus higher RoAS.
Move up faster on your career journey – Marketing is always in the hot seat. CEOs, CFOs, and Boards have opinions on everything. If you don’t lead them, they’ll try to lead you. And you know how that goes. Offense is the best defense. By showing quick, tangible lifts from these simpler forms of personalization, you can secure ’quick wins’, add more value, and protect your seat at the table.
(By the way, these four steps make up my Return on Marketing Career (RoMC) framework—more on that here.)
If you’re ready to test out this simpler, more scrappy approach to personalization, hit reply and let me know.
Let’s turn those three big affinities into tangible RoAS lifts – and maybe transform your career trajectory in the process.
References
Netflix’s Annual Technology Budget, (approx. figures). Netflix invests significantly – between $280–$560 million annually – into recommendation and personalization technology alone, highlighting the scale of investment required for industry-leading personalized user experiences.
That level of investment is way beyond the means of most mid-market organizations, but that does not mean that scrappy personalization can’t work for you. Here are just a few of the examples that prove it:
McKinsey & Company (2022), Example Case Study: Personalization Tactics That Drive ROAS. Real-world insights demonstrating that even modest personalization (segmented messaging and tailored landing pages) can lead to significant improvements in ROAS.
Harvard Business Review (2021), Harvard Business Review: Personalization at Scale. Detailed discussion exploring the balance between achieving personalization and managing practical considerations, such as cost, complexity, and organizational buy-in. The article underscores the effectiveness of targeted yet simple personalization strategies in driving measurable results.
If you’d like to discuss your career journey with me one-to-one, please feel free to email me at [email protected] or message me on LinkedIn.
Thank you for reading.
If you know someone who you think would appreciate this newsletter, please forward it to them.